JustKneller
Habitué
- Messages
- 852
Slightly related tangent, it always seems weird to me when not buying something because it's too expensive is framed as a "boycott".
I think that's a good point. On one hand, calling these things a boycott has the advantage of highlighting that the consumers have a voice and there's a collective agreement about a product/pricing. On the other hand, it also has a connotation of extremism, when the reality is that the economy is tanking for the average American and they need to re-assess and scale back on a lot of purchases. I can only speak for the US, but the "virtue of selfishness" that has pervaded our economy and culture for so long is not sustainable. I don't recall a time where big price hikes with no real added value to the consumer ever worked out. It's going to hit luxury industries first and hardest. People will have to work more, have less money, and less time to play games. At this point, a lot of (leisure) industries are competing against people's grocery budgets. Good luck with that!
For MS/X-box, they've basically doubled the price, and are going to lose a lot of people. But, I bet they won't lose half, so they'll still come out ahead on profits. They'll see it as a win, and predatory business strategies will get stronger. But, it won't actually affect a lot of people because they'll just drop out of that sub-system.