- Messages
- 1,202
Yeah, at this stage, I feel painful even to argue about that. Almost 4 years of arguing. I guess for some, it will never be "BG3" based on a myriad of reasons, e.g. not isometric, not crunchy, not Bhaalspawn, not BioWare, etc etc.
Even the Early Access of BG3 was full of original games' references. It was enough for me. And as I explained quite a few times, for developers of many studios, the term "BG3" first and foremost, meant a title that can be a successor to the original game in terms of its status, popularity, impact, and ratings. This has been completed.
Also, considering the original plan for BG3 was to make Durge a default Tav, the Bhaalspawn Saga 3 could very well be true as well. It was reworked based on the community feedback that the game only approves evil actions, and thus a separate Tav was born.
Even the Early Access of BG3 was full of original games' references. It was enough for me. And as I explained quite a few times, for developers of many studios, the term "BG3" first and foremost, meant a title that can be a successor to the original game in terms of its status, popularity, impact, and ratings. This has been completed.
Also, considering the original plan for BG3 was to make Durge a default Tav, the Bhaalspawn Saga 3 could very well be true as well. It was reworked based on the community feedback that the game only approves evil actions, and thus a separate Tav was born.